This study uses the methods and procedures of psychological autopsy to portray the life of an academically gifted college student who completed suicide. The study is unique in that it follows the subject across his 21 years of life, highlighting relevant milestones and significant stages and events. A comprehensive view of the life and death of a gifted student is offered through both researchers' and parents' perspectives, along with multiple theoretical explanations, including a developmental explanation.
This psychological autopsy yielded three sets of findings: those that reflected exclusively on the subject's life, those that compare his life with 3 previous psychological autopsies conducted, and those that reflect the parents' observations and experiences of his life. Two important findings of this study include a depiction of the psychological makeup of a subject in interaction with his environment and the fact that many of the factors contributing to suicidal behavior identified for the general population of adolescents and young adults existed in this case, as well. Consequently, as Cross, Cook, and Dixon (1996) found, certain types of aberrant behavior, belief systems, or both should not be considered a typical part of being a gifted person; they should be recognized as potential indicators of suicidal behavior.
Few things are more disturbing than the death of a child. Even more upsetting is the death of a child by his or her own hand. An unfortunate characteristic of American culture since 1950 has been the increasing number of its population that completes suicide. For example, in 1990, 30,906 people completed suicide in the United States (Holinger, Offer, Barter, & Bell, 1994). In addition, steady increases in completed suicides have been documented over the past 4 decades in virtually every age group (0-14, 15-24, 25-40, 41-55, 56-70, and more than 70) studied. While the 15-24-year-olds (adolescents and young adults) ranked third in 1994 among all age groups in the total number of suicides (4,869), they ranked second lowest in rate of suicide (a calculation per 100,000 people) among all age groups (Holinger et al.).
Putting the Research to Use
The nature of killing oneself, while explained by psychological theory, is rooted in a most personal experience base (phenomenological), one that is rarely knowable to others. Preventing suicide, therefore, requires an in-depth understanding of the person at risk. To accomplish this goal, a developmental perspective is invaluable to, but rarely possible for, researchers and counselors. This study provides the reader examples of the personal experiences, characteristics, and perceptions of a gifted student who completed suicide. The comparison made of the personal characteristics and the known correlates and other at risk factors for suicidal behaviors can be applied by adults who are concerned about the well-being of their gifted child or student. In addition, the comments, explanations, and elaborations by the parents provide important insights into the efficacy of the theories used to explain the events and behaviors.
Suicide of Adolescents and Young Adults
The incidence of suicide has grown dramatically since 1955 and is now considered the second leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults (Capuzzi & Golden, 1988; Felner, Adan, & Silverman, 1992; Vital Statistics, 1986). In addition, historical patterns appear in the study of suicide among the 15- to 24-year-old age group. Higher rates of suicide were observed in the 1930s (the Great Depression), lower rates in the 1940s (World War II), and steady growth rates from the 1950s to the present. Cross-cultural data concerning the incidence of suicide shows a drastic increase from the ages of 5-14 to 15-24 (Holinger et al., 1994). In addition, gender effects appear cross-culturally, for males have a higher rate of completed suicide at nearly every age level (Holinger et al.).
Hidden within the overall group of adolescents are subgroups with a higher rate of suicide than the average rate for the entire group. For example, the most startling estimates of subgroups of adolescents were forwarded by Alessi, McManus, Brickman, and Grapentine (1984), who found that 61% of juvenile defenders attempted suicide, and Tomlinson-Keasey and Keasey (1988), who estimated that 33% of troubled adolescents in their study attempted suicide. From these and other studies we can conclude that the rate of adolescent suicide has risen over the past 4 decades, as have the rates of other groups. We can also conclude that subgroups within the adolescent and young adult group vary in their rate of suicide.
The field of suicidology has made considerable strides in determining the rates of suicide among differing groups of people, researching the salient events and circumstances surrounding suicide, as well as the cataloging of characteristics shared by the victims of suicide. As evidence to this claim, Hollinger and Offer (1981) noted that the literature base on suicide doubled from 1969 to 1980. One of the most important contributions of previous research on adolescent suicide has been the determination that there are significant risk factors (see Table 1).
TABLE 1Significant Risk Factors Associated with Adolescent Suicide
Epidemiological research suggests that males have a higher rate of completed suicide at nearly every age level (Holinger et al., 1994). Individuals are considered at-risk for suicide when they present a variety of risk factors and begin thinking about or planning on taking their own lives. Salient risk factors related to suicide include psychiatric disorders; family relations; family history of psychiatric disorders, suicide, or both; abuse of drugs, alcohol, or both; environmental stresses; exposure to other attempts; social isolation; homosexuality; prior suicidal behavior; and firearms present within the home (Dixon & Scheckel, 1996; Holinger et al.).
Schuckit and Schuckit (1991) examined substance use and abuse as a risk factor in adolescent suicide. Controlled substances, alcohol, or both are frequently used as the means of self-harm or as a prelude to a suicidal act, contributing to reduced inhibitions, increased impulsivity, and impaired judgment. Socioeconomic factors associated with high risk of suicide include exposure to high levels of stress, especially at an early age (Pfeffer, 1991). Such stresses include loss of social supports through death, parental separation or divorce, change in school environments, and problems with peer relationships.
Holinger et al. (1994) reviewed retrospective and prospective research on suicide and found that most individuals who kill themselves meet criteria for diagnosable psychiatric disorders, including affective disorders (25-75%), personality disorders (25-40%), or both. The diagnoses in these cases were, however, made after the suicide. In fact, one study reported that "only 24% of completed suicides (male and female, all ages) had been in contact with mental health services within the past two years" (Appleby, 1999, p. 3). The comorbidity of affective disorders, personality disorders, substance abuse, or some combination of these two factors appears to be particularly lethal. Approximately 25-50% of adolescents completing suicide have a family history of psychiatric disorders, suicides, or both, and 25-50% have previously attempted to take their own lives. The number and lethality of attempts were also found to correlate positively with completed suicide. In addition, when firearms were found within the home, a marked increase in the risk of suicide was observed. Sexual identity issues, such as homosexuality, also increased the risk of suicide among adolescents. Research (Sargent, 1984; Shaffer, 1974) has indicated that suicide completers tend to be brighter than average.
A variety of psychologists proposed alternative theories about why adolescence is a time of contemplation of suicide for some. First and foremost, suicide has been linked to the presence of depression. For individuals who are depressed, suicide may be seen as a viable option. For example, Golombek (Sargent, 1984) studied the relationship of depression, risk of suicide, and personality in what he identified as three stages of adolescence. According to Sargent (1984), Golombek theorized that
Therefore, Golombek viewed late adolescence as the time that suicide could most likely result from depression, thereby explaining the increased incidence of suicide at this stage of development.
Shneidman (1981) discussed four elements of suicide: (a) heightened inimicality, (b) exacerbation of perturbation, (c) increased constriction of intellectual focus (tunneling or narrowing of the mind's content), and (d) cessation. Inimicality involves "qualities within the individual that are unfriendly toward the self" (p. 222), or ways in which the individual is his or her own enemy, such as engaging in self-destructive behaviors. According to Shneidman, perturbation refers to "how disturbed, 'shook up,' ill at ease, or mentally upset a person is" (p. 223). Dichotomous thinking, blocking out memories of the past, or avoiding thought about how others would be affected are examples of constriction. Shneidman identified the concept of cessation as the spark that ignites the above potentially explosive mixture. Cessation involves the idea that one can put a stop to his or her pain, thereby producing a perceived solution for the desperate individual.
Psychodynamic explanations, such as Freud's, have viewed suicide as internal conflict of aggression turned upon one's self (Grollman, 1971; Stillion & McDowell, 1996). A suicide attempt may also be the expression of aggression against an internalized object (Shneidman, 1981). A more contemporary psychodynamic theory of suicide is that adolescents who complete suicide escape conflict and stress (Holmes, 1991). Evidence of the influence stress can have on the incidence of suicide includes the historical patterns apparent in the field of suicidology. For example, higher rates of suicide were observed during the Great Depression, a time of great stress.
Humanistic theories purport that, "provided basic needs are met, humans are essentially growth-oriented creatures whose nature is directed toward realizing their potential if external conditions permit" (Stillion & McDowell, 1996, p. 58). Therefore, suicidal adolescents may have difficulty fulfilling their basic needs. Existential theory focuses on the difficulty individuals can have in finding meaning in their lives. Inability to discover meaning in life can also lead to feelings of uselessness, hopelessness, and depression. These feelings can, in turn, lead to suicide (Frankl, 1963).
One cognitive explanation for suicide suggests that, when adolescents lack adequate problem-solving skills and face stress-provoking problems, they develop an attitude of hopelessness and eventually attempt suicide because they see no other alternative. Holmes (1991) described this process as follows: An inability to solve their problems can lead adolescents to feelings of hopelessness, which can be closely related to suicide. Once cognitively rigid adolescents decide on suicide as a solution to their problems, they will pursue only that solution and not consider or develop alternative solutions.
Stillion and McDowell (1996) integrated many of the above theories in their Suicide Trajectory Model, which includes four main categories of risk factors that should be examined when working with suicidal adolescents: biological (e.g., depression, genetic factors, male gender), psychological (e.g., depression, low self-esteem, hopelessness, existential issues, poor coping strategies), cognitive (e.g., developmental level, negative self-talk, cognitive rigidity, generalization, selective abstraction, inexact labeling), and environmental (e.g., negative family experiences, negative life events, loss, presence of firearms). Along with influencing the occurrence of suicide among adolescents, these risk factors may also influence each other. For example, an adolescent who has encountered negative family experiences may, in turn, have poor coping strategies. Stillion and McDowell described the influence of the factors identified in their model of suicidal ideation, gestures, and attempts in adolescents.
Therefore, according to these authors' views, understanding suicide among adolescents involves understanding the life experiences related to each of the above risk factors and how they contribute to the decision to attempt suicide.
Suicide of Gifted Adolescents and Young Adults
Given our ability to estimate the rate of suicide among the general population of people from 15-24 years of age, what do we know about the suicides of gifted adolescents and young adults? Unfortunately, there is a paucity of research on the suicidal behavior of this group (Cross, 1996; Cross, Cook, & Dixon, 1996). Table 2 includes six reasons that there have been few studies conducted on the suicides of gifted students.
TABLE 2Reasons Few Studies Have Been Conducted on the Suicides of Gifted Students
Dixon and Scheckel (1996) summarized current thinking about the characteristics of gifted adolescents often associated with risk of suicide. They include perfectionism (Blatt, 1995), isolationism related to extreme introversion (Kaiser & Berndt, 1985), unusual sensitivity and perfectionism (Delisle, 1986), and the five overexcitibilities (psychomotor, sensual, intellectual, imaginational, and emotional) identified by Dabrowski as part of his Theory of Positive Disintegration and elaborated on by Piechowski (1979).
Other authors have discussed suicide and gifted students through the lens of humanistic psychology. These authors (e.g., Roeper & Willings, 1984; Webb, Meckstroth, & Tolan, 1982) have discussed the characteristics and tendencies that they believe put gifted students at risk for suicidal behaviors. Delisle (1982), after having reviewed the literature base, listed lack of friendships, self-deprecation, sudden shift in school performance, total absorption in school work, and frequent mood shifts as possible warning signs of suicidal behavior among gifted students. Although these articles are informative, they are strictly theoretical, not empirical.
Another subset of the literature base is made up largely of epidemiological studies concerned with incidents of attempted suicide and completed suicide (Cross, 1996). Hayes and Sloat (1990) investigated the prevalence of suicide among gifted students across 69 schools in a fourcounty region. They found that 8 of the 42 cases of attempted suicide were among gifted students, but none actually died by suicide.
Parker and Adkins (1995) found that students in honors colleges demonstrated significantly higher scores on subscales of an instrument measuring neurotic perfectionism. They questioned whether elevated perfectionism is indicative of a "predisposition to maladjustment or is a healthy component of the pursuit of academic excellence among the highly able" (p. 303).
Two studies (Tomlinson-Keasey & Warren, 1987; Tomlinson-Keasey, Warren, & Elliot, 1986) drew on longitudinal data from the Terman sample focusing on the suicides of females. Discriminant function analyses were performed in both studies, yielding "signatures of suicide." The signatures included in the analysis--previous suicide attempts, anxiety, depression, temperament, mental health, loss of a father before age 20, stress in the family of origin, physical health, and alcohol abuse--correctly classified 37 of 40 participants. These signatures inform the knowledge base about gifted adult females of a certain generation who were determined to be gifted using Terman's notion of giftedness from the 1920s. Given that most suicides are males, plus the fact that the steady increase in suicides began in the 1950s, the signatures may have limited explanatory power in this study.
According to Cross (1996), the following can be said about the suicide of gifted adolescents.
While establishing incidence rates of suicide and describing the factors associated with suicide among gifted adolescents are important, another important goal of suicidology is to describe the lives of suicide victims (Cross, Cook, & Dixon, 1996). To that end, a variety of case studies of gifted students have been carried out in an attempt to shed light on the suicidal behavior of the subjects (Johnson, 1994; Peterson, 1993). One of the most promising approaches to studying the lives of gifted adolescents who have completed suicide is the psychological autopsy (Cook, Cross, & Gust, 1996; Cross et al.).
Three psychological autopsies of gifted adolescents were conducted in a previous study (Cross et al., 1996). Because of the similarities of the subjects in that study with the subject in this study, the results and conclusions of the previous study are presented later in this article. The Cross et al. study yielded two important findings. The first was that the emotional characteristics, relational factors, and behavior problems of the three gifted adolescents who completed suicide were consistent with the patterns of suicides of general adolescents. A second important finding revealed that factors in the three case studies were consistent with theories of and research on gifted adolescents.
The current study compares its findings with those of the three case studies of Cross, Cook, and Dixon (1996). The researchers believe that building a significant number of case studies within the research base on suicidal behavior of gifted students will eventually answer the questions of why gifted students complete suicide and what we can do to prevent it. In addition, various risk factors and theories of suicide are applied to this case study to provide greater understanding of factors contributing to the suicide of gifted individuals.
Methods and Procedures
This study uses the methods and procedures of psychological autopsy to describe the life of a gifted college student who completed suicide. The study is unique in that it follows the subject across his 21 years of life, looking at milestones, stages, and significant events through the eyes of both the researchers and the parents of the deceased child. The researchers and parents believe that combining information and interpretations offers the greatest potential for informing interested parties about the suicide of gifted students. Consequently, the parents have asked that the subject's name be revealed in this report, rather than have the subject remain anonymous. This is in part to diminish the potential stigmatization effects that are often associated with deaths by suicide. By making their son's life public, the emphasis of the study remains on the person and his development across his lifespan, as well as his characteristics and perceptions.
Rather than classifying the subject a priori as a casualty of a psychological malady, this study uses a phenomenological lens to examine his life. Following the Results section, several prominent psychological theories are used to explain the suicide. The parents of the subject comment on the degree to which each of the theories accurately reflects their observations of the subject across his 21 years. A partial inventory of risk factors is also included.
Reed Ball, the subject of this study, was a 21-year-old academically gifted college student living in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. He completed suicide in 1994. An American, Reed was born in Omaha, Nebraska, but lived in Canada much of his life. He was the younger of two sons in an intact family with both parents being professionals. He became a subject in this study after his parents read the article previously noted (Cross et al., 1996) and contacted the first author about the possibility of studying Reed's life. The initial contact was made in 1997, and data was collected through 2001.
The data-gathering approach used in this study is called psychology autopsy. Ebert (1987) described psychological autopsy (PA) as a process designed to assess a variety of factors, including behaviors, thoughts, feelings, and relationships, of an individual who is deceased. It was developed originally as a means of resolving equivocal deaths. The PA has expanded to include the analysis of nonequivocal suicides, with the intention of reducing their likelihood in similar populations (Jones, 1977; Neill, Benensohn, Farber, & Resnick, 1974). It can be used as a posthumous evaluation of mental, social, and environmental influences on the suicide victim. Because psychological autopsies enable researchers to investigate the lives of deceased subjects in an effort to reduce the likelihood of suicide among similar groups of individuals, it was chosen as the research approach for this study.
This psychological autopsy utilized two broad categories of information: (a) interviews with people with whom the victim had significant relationships (e.g., parents) and (b) archival information related to the victim (e.g., school records, test information, medical records, personal letters, essays, diaries, suicide notes, artwork, and reports from authorities). The researchers analyzed the information collected to identify themes and issues that may be valuable in the prediction of suicide within similar populations.
The study was conducted over a 4-year period from 1997 through 2001. Interviews with parents and the Reed documents, letters, and records were analyzed and are reported in the Appendix, providing a developmental history of milestones and significant events across Reed's life. The source of the information is indicated beside each summary statement. For example, when the summary statement states "notes" and "from parents," this information was obtained from the parents through notes they had written at that time in Reed's life. When the statement indicated "from Reed," the information was gathered from Reed's own writing. The parents reviewed the information in the Appendix, providing a member-checking opportunity for the researchers. The parents provided fact checking and also challenged or corroborated meanings drawn or interpretations made by the researchers. Parents also provided their own observations and experiences for each milestone or event recorded in the Appendix. The researchers and parents believe that the two sets of voices provide a substantial depiction of the subject across his 21 years.
The Appendix provides a timeline of significant events across the life of the subject, and Table 3 provides the themes observed from Reed's case history. Consistent with adolescent and young adult suicide in the general population, Reed was a Caucasian male who manifested four emotional characteristics: depression, anger (represented more in suppressed rage and frustration than physical actions), mood swings, and confusion about the future, while demonstrating poor impulse control (manifested more often in patterns of thought than in behavior). He experienced three relational commonalities with those in the general population who complete suicide: romantic relationship difficulties, self-esteem difficulties (either by exaggeration or self-condemnation), and isolation from persons capable of disconfirming irrational logic. Reed shared warning signs in several categories: behavior problems, period of escalation of problems, constriction, withdrawal from friends, dichotomous thinking, talking about suicide, and erratic school performance.
When comparing this case study to the previous three case studies by Cross, Cook, and Dixon, (1996), the following similarities were found:
These similarities are striking in their consistency. The parents confirmed Reed's similarity to the three other case studies: "This last analysis so clearly describes Reed, it is quite scary. We only wish we all had figured it out before Reed died."
TABLE 3Themes Observed from Case History
To enhance the level of explanatory power of the suicide, the researchers drew on major theories in psychology to consider the data collected. It is believed that none of the theories provide complete explanatory power, but all offer insight into Reed's suicidal behavior. His parents provided their assessment of the degree to which each theory captures their experiences with and observations of Reed. Table 4 provides a brief analysis of aspects of the salient information from the vantage point of multiple theories, and Table 5 highlights various risk factors applied to this case study.
TABLE 4Various Theories Applied to Case Study
TABLE 5Various Risk Factors Applied to Case Study
Psychological Theories of Suicide Applied to Case Study
Suicide has been clearly linked to the presence of depression. For Reed, periods of depression were present starting at age 7; such periods were apparent in parent notes of Reed's feelings of "crabbiness," missing schoolwork, and withdrawal from others. Reed's mood shifted from depression to more manic periods. It was during his more depressed periods that he viewed suicide as a viable option to escape his feelings of isolation and pain.
Parents: It is important to note two things. First, Reed started these mood swings so early that we all (parents, teachers, friends) just took them as part of Reed's personality. Second, Reed was "high functioning"--his manic periods appeared no more than Reed "finally getting his act together and working to potential," his depressive periods just the result of "normal" school bullying, etc. This was also 1975-1985, before Childhood Depression was widely known. In fact, when we talked to his Omaha pediatrician about Reed's mood swings, the doctor did note the possibility of a minimal brain dysfunction on Reed's records. No one ever connected it with Reed's later behavior, however, nor were they particularly interested in this early observation.
Reed's behavior in early and mid-adolescence appears to be explained by Golombek's theory concerning depression in early adolescence: "depression may be manifested by anger and disorganized or erratic behavior. In mid-adolescence, a stage of rebellion, depression may be seen in exaggerated autonomy and angry outbursts" (Sargent, 1984, p. 50).
According to Golombek, late adolescence is the time that suicide could most likely result from depression. For Reed, late adolescence was a time of increased withdrawal from others. For instance, parent notes from grade 12 indicate that Reed was "withdrawn... wants to be last... did faint in class one month ago... looks tired." Reed indicated in his suicide note in September 1992 that suicidal ideation began around age 13 (eighth grade). During the period of late adolescence, his feelings of sadness and guilt clearly became more self-directed, resulting in his completed suicide in early adulthood.
Heightened inimicality, one of the four elements of suicide described in Shneidman's (1981) theory, involves "qualities within the individual that are unfriendly toward the self" (p. 222). This includes self-destructive behaviors. For Reed, this involved his withdrawal from others, his dishonesty with others versus the honesty he had with himself, and his attachment to others when feelings were not mutual or on the same level.
Parents: Reed's suicide note is so telling here: "By the time I had gotten to high school, I was spending an average of 2 hours each day analyzing myself--usually looking at what the day had brought; and what I had done; and how I could do it differently, better. Plus, I always had some old mistakes that I had made that I wanted to find solutions for in case similar situations came up again."
According to Shneidman (1981), perturbation, another element of suicide described in his theory, refers to "how disturbed, 'shook up,' ill at ease, or mentally upset a person is" (p. 223). In October 1992, Reed wrote to a friend of his fear of losing control, his lost trace of reality (experiencing memories of events that did not happen), and his concern about what he might do to others if not in complete control, all illustrating perturbation. Another element of Shneidman's theory, constriction, was evident in Reed's behavior in the form of dichotomous thinking, blocking out memories of the past, or avoiding thoughts about how others would be affected. It was especially clear that Reed blocked out thoughts of how his family would be greatly affected by his death.
Parents: From our perspective, his not thinking of the impact of his suicide on us was/is the "normal" path of suicide--folks about to complete suicide go into a "tunnel" and don't hear/feel the love and caring of those about them. An example would be from his suicide note:
"At some point; I'm not quite sure when though; I noticed something. Through all of my introspection, I had managed to develop a rigid code of ethics to live and act by. I think it may have come out of pride; if I were the best, then I should be able to find solutions to manipulation that were undetectable to others. And then that didn't harm others; and finally; that helped others; and even then; only those who wanted to be helped. An ego-centered person; I was so full of myself that I felt I should be able to achieve results without hurting people; or affecting those who didn't want to be." I remember him telling me about this "code of ethics" when he was in high school and having the uneasy feeling that, while they sounded "high-minded," they were manipulative. Something wasn't quite right. There is also the more "generic" observation here that Reed's lifelong coping strategy was avoidance/escapism.
Rather than facing the hard work in whatever, he would back away and decide he didn't want to do that anymore. Rather than thinking of the effect of his death on others, Reed focused on his fear of hurting others through his behaviors if he continued living. Cessation involves the idea that one can put a stop to his pain, thereby producing a perceived solution for the desperate individual. Reed's suicide notes made reference to his desire to escape the pain he was experiencing. In addition, he engaged in various escapist behaviors in his life (e.g., withdrawal from others, self-analysis) that also contributed to his pattern of escaping painful aspects of his life.
Reed's behavior certainly fits within psychodynamic explanations of suicide as internal conflict or aggression turned upon one's self (Grollman, 1971; Stillion & McDowell, 1996) or the expression of aggression against an internalized object (Shneidman, 1981). A more contemporary psychodynamic theory of suicide is that individuals who complete suicide escape conflict and stress (Holmes, 1991). As mentioned earlier, Reed engaged in a variety of escapist behaviors, including early interest in fire, self-analysis, and withdrawal from others. In his "Dream Paper" from the 11th grade, Reed noted "reality is not pleasant." Therefore, he used various ways to escape his situation, ultimately resulting in taking his own life.
Existential theory (e.g., Frankl, 1963) focuses on the difficulty individuals can have in finding meaning in their lives. Inability to discover meaning in life can also lead to feelings of uselessness, hopelessness, and depression. These feelings can, in turn, lead to suicide. Reed attempted to find meaning in his relationships with others. However, these relationships did not include the level of intimacy Reed desired, leaving him feeling disillusioned and alone, adding to his depression.
Parents: While we agree that Reed struggled with discovering the "meaning of life," we come to it from a different perspective. First, finding the "meaning in life" seemed to be far more important to Reed than most people--Dabrowski's "overexcitabilities" perhaps?
For a long time, we struggled with the analysis that "problem with relationships" was Reed's "problem." Reed, by both his definition and ours, had many good friends; actually far more really good, long-term friends than the rest of our family can claim. Young and old liked Reed! And Reed cared about his friends. In fact, that may be why we missed the fact that he did, indeed, struggle with "relationships"--specifically with [female] "kindred spirit" and/or romantic relationships. Our family [are] basically introverts. We have friends, but we "live" in our heads, rather than hearts. We enjoy peers at work and committees, we care for our friends, but have little need to "socialize." So, it wasn't until I happened to be talking to Dr. Sal Mendaglio one day that the penny dropped. Dr. Mendaglio's notion is [that it is] whether a person "needs" friends that makes a difference. Or, as stated above, Reed needed to find meaning in his relationships with others and, by his measure, was unsuccessful in doing that.
A key loss that also needs mentioning is Reed's loss of his core identity as a "math whiz" when he went to university. This had been a key component of Reed's identity since he was 3, and it wasn't without foundation. He'd learned to play Monopoly at age 3 (and beat us!). We had to send 3-year-old Reed out of the room when we were doing math flash cards with his 5-year-old brother; he was 32nd in the national [Canadian] grade-10 math competition. So, it's not surprising that he went into a tailspin when he went to university and abruptly discovered that "mathematics" (his dream!) wasn't what he expected and, to add insult to injury, was met with total disinterest when he attempted to talk to the mathematics department about his vision. We had tried to broaden his horizons along the way and again when the university math dream fell apart, but were never successful.
According to one cognitive explanation for suicide, adolescents who lack adequate problem-solving skills and face stress-provoking problems develop an attitude of hopelessness and eventually attempt suicide because they see no alternative. An inability to solve problems can lead to feelings of hopelessness, which can be closely related to suicide. For Reed, the difficulty experienced in developing intimate interpersonal relationships contributed to his feelings of hopelessness and the belief that he would hurt others if he allowed them to become too close to him.
Parents: It took us a long time after Reed died to correlate this theory to Reed, for, from many perspectives, Reed had excellent problem- solving skills! He loved to play highly complex computer role-playing games. He and his dad loved to tackle logic puzzles. He loved to play chess and did amazing things with computers. He successfully, if creatively, dealt with life's daily struggles (I missed the bus, now what do I do?). It wasn't till long after Reed died that I realized that, when psychologists talk about "problem-solving skills," they are talking about interpersonal problem solving and, perhaps adapting to change/trauma (like the move from Omaha).
Once adolescents or young adults who are cognitively rigid decide on suicide as a solution to their problems, they will pursue only that solution and not consider or develop alternative solutions. This was apparent with Reed. He noted experiencing suicidal ideation since age 13 and making over 12 attempts at ending his own life. He became extremely focused on this solution, discounting or not looking at other possibilities such as psychotherapy for easing his pain.
Parents: Absolutely. I remember the three of us talking at Reed's memorial service about how Reed's suicide was a "self-fulfilling prophecy." It was like a train roaring down a mountainside out of control. We could see it happening, but couldn't figure out the "brilliant intervention" to stop it.
Reed did not believe that his situation could improve, noting his belief that he was losing control of his behavior. The role that hopelessness plays in suicide was demonstrated in a study (Beck, Steer, Kovacs, & Garrison, 1985) in which inpatients were administered a hopelessness scale and followed to determine which ones had attempted suicide. Of the 14 patients who had attempted suicide, 13 had high scores on this scale. Hopelessness was present in Reed, as well.
Parents: Exactly. There is no more eloquent comment than Reed's own words in his suicide note: "I've taken away from myself the one thing I hold most dear. My freedom.
"While physically I'm not restrained; mentally I no longer have free will; and this binds me as much as chains and bars would. Everything I try to do automatically gets analyzed over and over by what my past has dictated is the best way. Every decision I make I know why I made it--even ones made in reaction to something back when I don't have time to think up front. Even the wrong decisions I know why I made them. And I know why my mind is set up to make those decisions. And the worst part about it is that the whole mess is a trap. Each 'wrong' decision is 'right' by some reason; and I am forced to accept that. I can't even fix the problem; because even though I could get rid of all this decision-making machinery of mind with the help of a good psychologist; there's one further problem.
"I've become the machinery. To destroy it would be to destroy me . . . and I can't live while I'm broken."
Furthermore, according to cognitive explanations, suicide can stem from two different classes of cognitions: (a) normal cognitions involving reduced problem-solving skills and hopelessness and (b) abnormal cognitions involving delusions and hallucinations (Holmes, 1991). It appears that, during the early stages of his suicidal ideation, Reed experienced normal cognitions involving reduced problem-solving skills and hopelessness. However, closer to his final attempt at self-harm, Reed began experiencing, as he noted, a "lost trace of reality," including memories of events that did not occur and reduced ability to control his actions.
Parents: Probably true. On the other hand, his long time girlbuddy told us that, the week before Reed suicided, he'd taken her out to dinner. They'd had a wonderful time, just like always. Neither she (nor other friends) had seen anything out of the ordinary--even after they became aware of the much touted "suicide warning signs." Our common analysis is that Reed had lived with depression for so long that he'd learned to "put on a happy face." And we, on the other hand, had just accepted all the funny little bits--they were just part of "Reed."
Suicide Trajectory Model
The risk factors described in Stillion and McDowell's (1996) Suicide Trajectory Model can be identified in Reed's case. For Reed, these included biological (depression, genetic factors, male gender), psychological (depression, low self-esteem, hopelessness, existential issues, poor coping strategies), cognitive (negative self-talk, cognitive rigidity), and environmental (negative life events) risk factors, which may also have influenced each other. For example, the negative life events (e.g., harassment by peers) experienced by Reed might have, in turn, contributed to his poor coping strategies, especially his concern about expressing his feelings to others.
According to Stillion and McDowell (1996), understanding Reed's suicide involves understanding the life experiences related to each of his risk factors and how they contributed to his decision to attempt suicide. Over time, the combined weight of the risk factors contributed to Reed's increased suicidal ideation, gesturing, and final attempt.
Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD)
Dabrowski's (1964) Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD) describes the characteristics that make up a person's Developmental Potential (DP). TPD includes five levels representing a continuum of emotional development from egocentric to altruistic. Piechowski (1999) characterized the hierarchy of levels as follows: I--Primary Integration, II--Unilevel Disintegration, III--Spontaneous Multilevel Disintegration, IV--Organized Multilevel Disintegration, and V--Secondary Integration. To move from one level to the next requires that lower order cognitive-emotional structures be replaced by higher order ones. Dabrowski called this process positive disintegration. Not everyone develops to the highest levels, however, and the TPD attempts to articulate factors of DP.
According to Dabrowski, DP is a function of heredity/ environment, psychic overexcitabilities, and dynamisms and is an indication of a person's capacity to move up the five levels of development. The five overexcitabilities are considered ways of experiencing the world. Psychic overexcitabilities include psychomoter, sensual, intellectual, imaginational, and emotional. Overexcitabilities are thought of as enhanced modes of being in the world (Pichowski, 1999). Some in the field of gifted education believe that Dabrowski's notion of overexcitabilities, as they influence a person's developmental potential, are indicators of that person's giftedness.
Although not a theory aimed at explaining suicidal behavior, TPD has been used increasingly over the past 20 years to describe the lives of gifted students. For example, Cross, Cook, and Dixon (1996) considered aspects of this theory when conducting psychological autopsies of three gifted adolescents. The TPD includes numerous dynamisms (autonomous inner forces) at the five levels of development. As revealed in the Cross et al. study, several of these dynamisms associated with levels IV and V were operative in Reed's life close to his successful suicide. Other dynamisms (dissatisfaction with oneself, disquietude with oneself, hierarchialization) associated with Level III were seen in Reed's life as a younger person. The dynamisms seen in Reed's life include self-awareness, autopsychotherapy, authentism, and personality ideal.
Somers (1981) claimed that strong relationships exist among college students' cognitive complexity, emotional responsiveness, and value systems. These ideas are similar to Dabrowski's. Reed's internal conflict was in many ways representative of Dabrowski's ideas about disintegration, manifesting both positive and negative characteristics. Negative disintegration is thought to reflect a self-centeredness that may have no moral or ethical component (Silverman, 1993). It is easy to see that a great potential for internal struggle exists when a person experiences both positive and negative aspects of disintegration and suffers from bipolar disorder. Clearly, the inner conflict with which Reed dealt was multifaceted. Because we found evidence of positive and negative disintegration, as well as evidence of the tension necessary to impel him to a higher level of development, we worry that there was no emotional safety net to land him safely at the next level. Hence, he was left in a long period of emotional distress and suffered in the way that Shneidman (1996) described as "psychache." While we are cautious about this interpretation, Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration was helpful to use when considering the potential suicidality of a gifted person.
The psychological autopsy of Reed Ball's life yielded three sets of findings: those that reflect only his life, those that compare his life with three previous psychological autopsies conducted, and those that ref lect his parents' observations and experiences of his life. The three sets of findings combined offer valuable information for identifying gifted students who may become suicidal. A few of the findings include the importance of understanding the interaction between the psychological makeup of a person in interaction with his or her environment. Parents, teachers, counselors, and peers should watch out for the same suicide correlates that have been identified for the general population of adolescents and young adults and should not consider aberrant behavior, belief systems, or both as a typical part of being a gifted person. Maintaining a relationship with a potentially suicidal gifted person is important as a protection against the tendency to restrict their interactions with others. Information about suicide needs to be immediately available to parents. Perhaps making this information widely available can save the lives of struggling gifted adolescents who are already experiencing greater life stressors than their nongifted peers (Coleman & Cross, 2001).
The psychological autopsy of Reed Ball's life also demonstrates the importance of further study of suicide among gifted adolescents and young adults. This study provided an examination of Reed's life from multiple perspectives and viewpoints. The authors came from a variety of backgrounds--research psychologist, licensed psychologist, and parent--all affected by suicide in a variety of ways. The diversity of these backgrounds proved advantageous in conducting this psychological autopsy in that it allowed a comprehensive view of Reed's life, focusing not only on the pathology of suicide, but the strengths of the individual, as well. Future studies of suicide among gifted adolescents and young adults should include examination of risk factors of suicide among this population, along with examination of factors essential to resiliency and the prevention of suicide.
Finally, the psychological autopsy of Reed Ball is one of tragedy and inspiration. It shows the tragic loss family, friends, schools, peers, and others experience when an adolescent or young adult takes his or her life. However, this study also provides inspiration through the dedication of his family who, having experienced such a great and terrible loss, has since worked to prevent the loss of others. Reed Ball's suicide demonstrates that the field of gifted and talented education needs to study and work to prevent the loss of others; the study and prevention of suicide needs to be a priority in the field. It also tells us that professionals, parents, and peers need to work together as a team in the prevention of suicide. Furthermore, professionals and parents need to provide safe environments that allow gifted and talented students to learn and grow and provide support for their mental health needs. And, most importantly, it tells us that communication and intervention are the key in preventing the loss of life to suicide. Even if there is some resistance in the individual at risk, it is essential that professionals, parents, and peers support each other in intervening and preventing such a death.
APPENDIXTo view the complete Appendix "Timeline of Significant Events in Reed's Lifespan" see page 14-18 of the original article.
About the Authors
Tracy L. Cross, PhD., is the George and Frances Ball Distinguished Professor of Gifted Studies at Ball State University, where he is also executive director of the Indiana Academy for Science, Mathematics, and the Humanities. He is the past-president of The Association for the Gifted (TAG) of the Council for Exceptional Children. He is the former editor of the Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, is just completing his term as editor of Gifted Child Quarterly, and is the current editor of the Roeper Review. Dr. Cross was the recipient of NAGC's 1996 Early Leader Award and the 1997 Early Scholar Award. He is author of On the Social and Emotional Lives of Gifted Children and coauthor, with Laurence J. Coleman, of Being Gifted in School.
Karen Gust-Brey, Ph.D., is a staff psychologist at the Ethan Allen School for Boys with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections/Division of Juvenile Corrections. Her practice is a licensed psychologist includes suicide prevention/intervention, crisis management, psychological assessment, and individual, family and group therapy with adjudicated delinquent males between the ages of 12 and 25. She received her Ph.D. in School Psychology from Ball State University in Muncie, IN. Her research interests include suicide among gifted adolecents and the recidivism and treatment of conduct disorder youth.
P. Bonny Ball, a former systems analyst for IBM, spent her later work life as a business analyst in human resources systems for a major Canadian oil company. Since her son's death in 1994, she has turned her analytical skills to collaborating with various professionals working in suicide prevention. These endeavors include reviewing/contributing to professional publications such as the British Columbia Guidelines for Clinicians Working with Suicidal Children and designing the brochure "Living with Someone Who is Suicidal." Bonny is currently on the board of the Canadian Association for Suicide Prevention.
Alessi, N. E., McManus, M., Brickman, A., & Grapentine, W. L.
(1984). Suicidal behavior among serious juvenile offenders.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 286-287.
Appleby, L. (Ed.). (1999). Safer services: The national confidential
inquiry into suicide and homicide by people with mental illness.
London: Department of Health Services.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R., Kovacs, M., & Garrison, B. (1985).
Hopelessness and eventual suicide: A 10-year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal ideation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 559-563.
Blatt, S. J. (1995). The destructiveness of perfectionism: Implications for the treatment of depression. American Psychologist, 50, 1003-1020.
Capuzzi, D., & Golden, L. (Eds.). (1988). Preventing adolescent suicide. Muncie, IN: Accelerated Development.
Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2001). Being gifted in school: An
introduction to development, guidance, and teaching. Waco, TX:
Cook, R. S., Cross, T. L., & Gust, K. L. (1996). Psychological
autopsy as a research approach for studying gifted adolescents
who commit suicide. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 393-402.
Cross, T. L. (1996, May/June). Examining claims about gifted children and suicide. Gifted Child Today, 18(3), 46-48.
Cross, T. L., Cook, R. S., & Dixon, D. N. (1996). Psychological
autopsies of three academically talented adolescents who committed
suicide. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 403-409.
Dabrowski, K. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little,
Dabrowski, K. (1972). Psychoneurosis is not an illness. London: Gryf.
Davidson, L., & Linnoila, M. (Eds.). (1991). Risk factors for youth
suicide. New York: Hemisphere.
Delisle, J. (1982). Striking out: Suicide and the gifted adolescent.
G/C/T, 13, 16-19.
Delisle, J. (1986). Death with honors: Suicide among gifted adolescents.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 558-560.
Dixon, D. N., & Scheckel, J. R. (1996). Gifted adolescent suicide:
The empirical base. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 386-392.
Ebert, B. W. (1987). Guide to conducting a psychological autopsy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 11(1), 52-56.
Felner, R., Adan, A., & Silverman, M. (1992). Risk assessment
and prevention of youth suicide in schools and educational contexts. In R.
Maris, A. Berman, J. Maltsberger, & R. Yufit (Eds.), Assessment and prediction of suicide (pp. 420-447). New York: Guilford.
Frankl, V. E. (1963). Man's search for meaning: An introduction to
logotherapy (I. Lasch, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Grollman, E. A. (1971). Suicide: Prevention, intervention, postvention. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hayes, M., & Sloat, R. (1990). Suicide and the gifted adolescent.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 229-244.
Holinger, P. C., & Offer, D. (1981). Perspectives on suicide in adolescence. In R. Simmons (Ed.), Social and Community Mental
Health (Vol. 2, pp. 139-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Holinger, P. C., Offer, D., Barter, J. T., & Bell, C. C. (1994).
Suicide and homicide among adolescents. New York: Guilford Press.
Holmes, D. (1991). Abnormal psychology. New York: HarperCollins.
Johnson, M. C. (1994, September/October). Cerulean sky: A
gifted student explains his differences and difficulties. Gifted
Child Today, 17(5), 20-21, 42.
Jones, D. (1977). Suicide by aircraft: A case report. Aviation, Space,
and Environmental Medicine, 48, 454-459.
Kaiser, C. F., & Berndt, D. J. (1985). Predictors of loneliness in
the gifted adolescent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 74-77.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1986). Advance report of
final morality statistics, 1984 (NCHS Publication No. 86-1120). Hyattsville, MD: Author.
Neill, K., Benensohn, H., Farber, A., & Resnick, H. (1974). The
psychological autopsy: A technique for investigating a hospital
suicide. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 25, 33-36.
Parker, W. D., & Adkins, K. K. (1995). The incidence of perfectionism
in honors and regular college students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 303-309.
Peterson, J. (1993, January/February). What we learned from
Genna. Gifted Child Today, 16(1), 15-16.
Pfeffer, C. R. (1991). Family characteristics and support systems
as risk factors for youth suicidal behavior. In L. Davidson & M. Linnoila (Eds.), Risk factors for youth suicide (pp. 55-71). New York: Hemisphere.
Piechowski, M. (1979). Developmental potential. In N. Colangelo & T. Zaffran (Eds.), New voices in counseling the gifted (pp. 25-57). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
Piechowski, M. (1999). Overexcitabilities. In M. A. Runco & S.
R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativitiy. (Vol. 2., pp. 325-334). San Diego: Academic Press
Roeper, A., & Willings, D. (1984, November). Styles of counseling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Gifted Children, St. Louis, MO.
Sargent, M. (1984). Adolescent suicide: Studies reported. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 1(2), 49-50.
Schuckit, M. A., & Schuckit, J. J. (1991). Substance use and abuse: A risk factor in youth suicide. In L. Davidson & M. Linnoila (Eds.), Risk factors for youth suicide (pp. 156-167). New York: Hemisphere.
Shaffer, D. (1974). Suicide in childhood and early adolescence.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 15, 275-291.
Shneidman, E. (1981). Suicide thoughts and reflections. Suicide
and Life-Threatening Behavior, 11, 198-231.
Shneidman, E. (1996). The suicidal mind. New York: Oxford
Silverman, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver: Love.
Somers, S. (1981). Emotionally reconsidered. The role of cognition in emotional responiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 553-561.
Stillion, J. M., & McDowell, E. E. (1996). Suicide across the life
span. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
Tomlinson-Keasey, C., & Keasey, C. B. (1988). "Signatures" of
suicide. In D. Capuzzi & L. Golden (Eds.), Tomlinson-Keasey, C., & Warren, L. W. (1987). Suicide among
gifted women. Gifted International, 4(1), 1-7.
Tomlinson-Keasey, C., Warren, L., & Elliott, J. (1986). Suicide
among gifted women: A prospective study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 123-130.
Webb, J. T., Meckstroth, E. A., & Tolan, S. S. (1982). Guiding the
gifted child. Dayton, OH: Psychology Press.
Copyrighted material from the National Association for Gifted Children (NAGC), http://www.nagc.org. This material may not be reproduced without permission from NAGC.
This article is provided as a service of the Davidson Institute for Talent Development, a 501(c)3 nonprofit dedicated to supporting profoundly gifted young people 18 and under. To learn more about the Davidson Institute’s programs, please visit www.DavidsonGifted.org.
The appearance of any information in the Davidson Institute's Database does not imply an endorsement by, or any affiliation with, the Davidson Institute. All information presented is for informational purposes only and is solely the opinion of and the responsibility of the author. Although reasonable effort is made to present accurate information, the Davidson Institute makes no guarantees of any kind, including as to accuracy or completeness. Use of such information is at the sole risk of the reader.